* Yves-Alexis Perez (cor...@debian.org) [090825 10:31]: > On lun, 2009-08-24 at 22:25 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > 2. only "dependency_libs" to remove their la-file RSN, because they > > block removal of the la-files on another package (this flag can be > > wrongly hit if a package depends only on itself - but well, > > dropping the la-file is recommended as well here as with 1.) > > I have a package (gtk2-engine-murrine) present there (with a > dependency_libs: and which is present in depended_on of other packages) > but doesn't ship any .la file. What's the problem and how can I solve > it?
Looking at the package, /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libmurrine.la looks like an la-file to me. As your package is only with dependency_libs, you could drop that file on building the package (depending on your installation method remove it from the debhelper install file, just remove it in debian/rules, or whatever else is needed). Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
