[Paul Wise] > Summarizing the upstream thread, it seems the solution they prefer is > to just ignore dependency_libs when linking dynamically.
Sounds good to me. I can't comment on the Libs/Libs.private split, except that if Steve is right and this is mostly for Gtk, they're already pretty married to pkg-config, so I wouldn't think libtool would have to support this. Does upstream have a timeline? After they make the change, how long before we in Debian can assume our issues are all addressed? I ask because most upstreams include a private copy of libtool, and I don't know if we'd feel as though we need to accommodate that. -- Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
