Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 03:54:29PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote: > >> On Sunday 31 May 2009 15:32:25 John Goerzen wrote: >> >> >> >>> #2 and #4 especially should be exceptionally trivial patches. >>> >>> Why are you tagging it wontfix, Sune? >>> >> I see no reason to deviate from upstream's choices here, no matter how >> trivial >> the patches are. >> >> Here is no bug, so here is nothing to fix. >> >> There is a design decision you don't like, well. Learn to live with it. >> >> If upstream changes, we will follow, though. >> Just because we *can* patch things does not mean we should. >> >> And I consider this debate closed, and please find a different battle field >> that >> doesn't involve me for fighting DRM. >> > > Note that consistency between the pdf readers within the distro is > worth keeping the debate open. > if we wanted consistency then we would stick to a single PDF reader and throw out the rest. if they all work the same then what's the point in maintaining all of them?
/Johan > Mike > > > -- -- ------------------------------------------------ Johan Henriksson MSc Engineering PhD student, Karolinska Institutet http://mahogny.areta.org http://www.endrov.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
