On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 03:54:29PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote: > I see no reason to deviate from upstream's choices here, no matter > how trivial the patches are. <snip> > There is a design decision you don't like, well.
Thanks for the clarity. As hinted in my previous post, I consider that you (KDE maintainer in general) are totally empowered to take it [1]. Still, I've an unanswered curiosity which might help in the debate. Beside the per-user setting, is there any system-wide setting that the local sysadm can trigger to have DRM-free okular by default for all its users? While I see as reasonable that you took this choice, I see similarly reasonable that you give the choice to sysadms to make a different choice easily. If this thread has shown something, is that the choice is a debatable one, hence it is very likely that sysadms out there will have such a desire. Many thanks in advance, Cheers. [1] as well as John, or anybody else, is entitled to escalate the issue to the CTTE, now that is clear that on your side the issue is closed -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature