also sprach Peter Eisentraut <pet...@debian.org> [2009.05.09.1142 +0200]: > There are really two orthogonal things being discussed here: One question is > whether the default MTA should be a full or proper implementation versus a > tiny and limited implementation (or -- the latest idea -- none at all). The > other is whether, if the full implementation is chosen, it should be Exim or > Postfix. It might lead this argument to a clearer conclusion if those two > issues are treated separately.
There's a third, issue, which is #508644: to abstract default-mta (or similar), to make any such transition feasible in a future-proof way. Maybe we ought to concentrate on that first? I think I am to blame a bit for adding to the fuel of the postfix-exim4 debate with the doodle link, which just took us away from the actual discussion. Sorry. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "although occasionally there is something to be said for solitude." -- special agent dale cooper
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
