2009/3/26 Tzafrir Cohen <tzaf...@cohens.org.il> > I'm trying to follow this thread, but I'm not sure everybody here even > using the same terminology. > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:01:22PM +0100, Cassiel wrote: > > Hi > > > > 2009/3/26 Adrian Knoth <a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> > > > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:05:32PM +0100, Grammostola Rosea wrote: > > > > > > > The problem is an realtime kernel and a proper configuration for > music > > > > production. Without that, you better stay away from music production > > > > > > Not really. I absolutely have no problems with CONFIG_PREEMPT, > dynticks, > > > ondemand scheduler and all this fancy stuff in a vanilla 2.6.29 running > > > on a dualcore amd64 laptop. > > > > > > It's an outdated myth that you need RT kernels for audio production, > > > though it helps with very low latencies. (let's say buffer sizes below > > > 10ms and high CPU loads) > > > > > > > > maybe it is worthwhile to clarify where "audio production" begins and > "audio > > fun" ends. > > Recording 16 tracks + monitoring could be an impossible task with your > !=RT > > kernel. > > Could you please be more specific? > > What extra patches do you think need applying? > > What changes to the configuration are needed? > > Vs. what upstream kernel version? > > References, supporting benchmarks and such would be an added bonus.
When talking about RT kernel only one patch comes into play -->> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/ other references regarding kernel config are found in -->> http://www.alsa-project.org/main/index.php/Low_latency_howto IMHO, the upstream kernel version should follow the RT patch releases. Benchmarks can be easily provided by users if encouraged to use the same toolbox, eg.-->> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tglx/rt-tests.git;a=summary Actually I have none but as I introduced in the previous post recording one more track on my i386 PentiumIV dual core running Ardour with 14-16 tracks + fx + software monitoring (i.e. ardour) is possible running RT kernels, running stock kernels results in too many xruns. regards & apologize for my bad english r