Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Hmm. I am not so sire it is nonsense. Yes, the release > > team is not alone in this, and, really, all of us are somewhat to > > blame for not helping the kernel team fix the DFSG violations. > > But I don't think that the release team is blameless, either, > > since they decided to release with DFSG violating code. > > We didn't decide to release yet...
That's not the point being made: As I understand Manoj's point, it is that tagging a bug ‘lenny-ignore’ is an active decision that a particular bug, even if it represents a DFSG violation, will not be considered in the decision to release. To that extent, it *is* making the decision that it is acceptable to release Debian with DFSG-violating works, in advance of the decision to actually release. -- \ “As the evening sky faded from a salmon color to a sort of | `\ flint gray, I thought back to the salmon I caught that morning, | _o__) and how gray he was, and how I named him Flint.” —Jack Handey | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
