Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:38:00PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> ... and if it is *not* different, why should be the release managers >> be considered responsible for it? They "just" decide (and kudos for >> all their hard work, BTW) if something which is already in Debian gets >> released or not. > > I am not sure that violating a foundation document falls under > the powers of a delegate. I wish it did, being a delegate, but it does > not. I looked. Stop this nonsense, it's not the release team that is violating a foundation document. It's Debian as a whole and it's happening now, not when we release or not. The only thing we did as a release team is to make clear that we don't want to delay the release if these bugs won't get fixed. As always we don't object that lenny-ignore bugs would get fixed before lenny. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
