martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.05.18.0401 +0100]:
>> I won't speak for Joey, but I consider a divergence a bug in the sense >> that I'd use with a general bug-tracking system: it's something about >> the package and/or the packaged software that, in an ideal world, would >> be improved. Nothing more (or less) than that. > Like making upstream software use something like sensible-browser? If it were a configure option, we wouldn't need an upstream divergence and could just add a configure option in debian/rules. Any time we're actually patching upstream source, there's going to be some way that we could avoid that by adding more configuration to upstream. I'm not sure that's *always* a good idea, but in most cases it would be. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
