Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, from a bug submitter point of view, I don't think I want to > see the bug report kept open (tagged divergence) after it has > actually been closed by a Debian-specific patch. As upstream it > might make a fair bit of sense but as a user / bug submitter, it > will just look odd.
Would your opinion be different if the bug was "fixed" but not closed nor archived, until the "divergence" tag is gone? > A user reporting a bug in foo should not still be wondering why the > bug is open after the fix has been applied. Isn't that a matter easily resolved by presenting the bug information appropriately in the interface? -- \ “Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code | `\ will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live.” —John | _o__) F. Woods | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
