Please follow <URL:http://www.debian.org/MailingLists#codeofconduct> and avoid sending messages individually to someone when the message is also sent to the list, unless they ask for it.
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 06:01:19AM +0000, Ben Finney wrote: > > The Debian BTS is already on the list of places to go for > > information about Debian package changes. The proposal in this > > thread doesn't increase that. > > For _debian_ packagers yes. But such a tool would be useful for > upstreams, and form them it *is* one another place to look at. And > most wont, because for large upstreams, there's this huge userbase > you see, and the huge number of downstreams, and huge number of > downstreams issue trackers. They can't look at them all. So it's already the case that they have a certain number of places to look, *including* the Debian BTS if the work is packaged for Debian. I don't see that this proposal changes that. -- \ "Program testing can be a very effective way to show the | `\ presence of bugs, but is hopelessly inadequate for showing | _o__) their absence." —Edsger W. Dijkstra | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]