On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:06:15 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 04:14 -0700, Bruce Sass wro
>>
>> AFAICT, "/bin/sh can be a symbolic link to any POSIX compatible
>> shell" does not really convey what Debian wants, it would be better
>> to state that, `only POSIX features should be used in Debian "sh"
>> scripts', followed by a list of exceptions (which would presumably
>> be a subset of those features in common use which exist in all
>> shells allowed to be "sh".)
> The problem is that "POSIX feature" is a meaningless term in this
> context.
> If "test -a" is not a POSIX feature (or any other random test
> arguments bandied about here), then so calling "debconf" is also not
> a POSIX feature, and for exactly the same reason: either might be
> overridden by a builtin.
Debian Technical policy is applicable to Debian systems. A
POSIX shell, in this context, lives on a Debian OS. I the shell
overrides debconf in an incompatible manner, that would break things,
and would be a grave bug.
Policy is to allow people to assemble packages for a Debian
system, and is not meant to be used for honing debating skills over
corner cases.
In this case, your scripts are meant tot be runnable using a
POSIX (+ a few features) compatible shell on a Debian system. It is
understood that the shells in question do not have grave bugs.
manoj
--
byob, v: Believing Your Own Bull
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
