On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:36:47 +0100, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On the other hand, it more or less mandates that /bin/sh is > /bin/bash (because /bin/sh is not a config file, and baring policy > authorization, users are not supposed to change symlinks in > /bin). No. Debian technical policy applies to Debian packages, not to Debian users. > his looks like a regression a regression in user choice: I expect > there are sufficiently many Debian installation where /bin/sh is > /bin/dash for us to claim that /bin/sh pointing to /bin/dash is a > supported and tested configuration. Secondly, policy is not exhaustive in that it tries to pecify everything that is permissible. manoj -- This is the sort of English up with which I will not put. Winston Churchill Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]