On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 10:54:58AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 07:26:07PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:56:10PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > I hadn't replied to the bug report because I wasn't involved in the > > > Ubuntu kernel at the point when it was filed, so I didn't reply there. > > > When you brought my attention to it, I pointed out two issues that you > > > could fix in seconds. I had none of the hardware in question, and didn't > > > want to spend time trying to work out if there was some subtle reason > > > for the code being there. There was certainly no effort to sabotage your > > > platform, and I haven't heard any sort of apology for your accusations. > > > > Well, i think that benc comment about "nobody should use oldworld's by now" > > is > > particularly clueless, and you in particular did know better than that. > > Fortunately, that isn't what was said, and you should stop placing quotation > marks around it.
Ok, second hand knowledge only, but this is how it was brought to my attention, feel free to correct me though. I am still a bit disgusted of seeing a bug report i provided to ubuntu, with patch and all the proper research immediately after the breezy beta go unanswered and uncared for though, so this may color my relationship with ubuntu, but i did also personally remove myself from all ubuntu channels and lists in order to not bother you with my personal issues, so seeing matthew bring this in here is i believe not correct. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
