On 16-Mar-06, 21:39 (CST), Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Daniel> The following is technically a well-formed diff:
>
> Daniel> --- init/main.c.orig 2006-03-15 23:11:48.000000000 +0200
> Daniel> +++ init/main.c 2006-03-15 23:12:23.000000000 +0200
> Daniel> @@ -653,6 +653,9 @@
>
> Daniel> static int init(void * unused)
> Daniel> {
> Daniel> + char *foo = NULL, *bar = NULL;
> Daniel> + strdup(bar, foo);
> Daniel> +
> Daniel> lock_kernel();
> Daniel> /*
> Daniel> * init can run on any cpu.
>
> What the heck? Are you implying that would be a suitable well-formed
> patch suitable for inclusion? Or did I miss some sarcasm?
You missed the sarcasm. I understood Daniel's point to be that just
because a patch is syntatically correct doesn't mean that it will (or
should) be applied.
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
world. -- seen on the net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
