On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:50:16PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The question is not what problems it would cause. The problems are side > > effects. It should stay in main because it is free software that is able to > > be used by at least some subset of our users, without any non-free software. > > Ok, this seems to be a simple factual question, and I have been unable > to see the answer despite careful reading of the thread and the bug > log. > > What is the subset of our users which would find ndiswrapper useful, > without the use of free software? I have heard some say that there > are no free drivers around for ndiswrapper to wrap. If that's true, > then wouldn't that make the subset in question the empty set? Or is > there some use to ndiswrapper without a driver to wrap with it?
You read the thread so closely that you missed all the references to CIPE? --Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
