Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What is the subset of our users which would find ndiswrapper useful, >> without the use of free software? I have heard some say that there >> are no free drivers around for ndiswrapper to wrap. If that's true, >> then wouldn't that make the subset in question the empty set? Or is >> there some use to ndiswrapper without a driver to wrap with it? > > You read the thread so closely that you missed all the references to CIPE?
Let's see, maybe you didn't read the paragraph where I said: Or, perhaps it's not true that there are no free drivers for it. The claim was also made that there was a single free driver out there for use with ndiswrapper, but others claimed that the hardware in question is already supported, and better, without the use of that driver. I don't know whether this is true, but if it is true, I would appreciate hearing why that should be treated differently than there being no such free driver at all. Is this CIPE? Or is that some other case? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
