On 10 Feb 2006, Anthony Towns outgrape:
> That view, namely "other people may propose ballots that aren't good
> enough, and it's my job to stop that", is precisely a supervisory
> one.
The secretary is responsible for running the vote, and also
has the final decision for the form of the ballot. It would be remiss
of me to let a ballot go by which i consider incorrect.
> Personally, I'd rather the secretarial role be as automatic as
> possible, even to the point where votes would be run without any
> human intervention. I've thought about that before, but I don't
> have the inclination to write any code for it.
You know how to change the constitution. Currently, the
secretaries role is far from being a rubber stamp.
manoj
--
To program is to be.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
