On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 12:36:54PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [Christopher Martin] > >> If an issue is highly controversial, then I can think of no better > >> way of settling it in a way that most developers will accept than a > >> vote. People respect votes much more than decrees, even if they don't > >> agree with them. > > > > And yet in this very thread we *still* have people whinging about GR > > 2004-03 being "deceptive". (Yes, *after* you all had the opportunity > > in 2004-04 to repeal it, and didn't do so.) Either astounding or > > depressing. > > Has anyone come forward and said "I was deceived by GR 2004-03"? I > wonder. I don't recall anyone saying that.
Jerôme Marant, in this very thread, in a message you replied to (though he did not do so with the exact phrase above). -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
