Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How else do you handle the case of a library which implements a line > protocol (presumably Unix sockets, in this case), and that protocol has > changed incompatibly?
You implement the new protocol on a new port, so that both the old and new jackd can be run at the same time. >> This has been going on for three months. > > Why has it taken three months for the reverse dependencies to be rebuilt? > That shouldn't really be acceptable, whether or not there's some reason for > (effective) conflicts between different versions of the lib. AFAICT there weren't bugs filed against those packages telling them to be rebuilt, because the libjack people believe their libraries don't conflict. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
