On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 10:14:47AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > >> This has been going on for three months.
> > Why has it taken three months for the reverse dependencies to be rebuilt? > > That shouldn't really be acceptable, whether or not there's some reason for > > (effective) conflicts between different versions of the lib. > AFAICT there weren't bugs filed against those packages telling them to > be rebuilt, because the libjack people believe their libraries don't > conflict. Then the "libjack people" need to be cluebatted, whoever they are; conflicts aren't the only reason why bugs should be filed. Anyway, bugs #317196, 317208, 321222, and presumably various others were filed by *someone*... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
