Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > >> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > How else do you handle the case of a library which implements a line >> > protocol (presumably Unix sockets, in this case), and that protocol has >> > changed incompatibly? >> >> You implement the new protocol on a new port, so that both the old and >> new jackd can be run at the same time. > > No, you design the protocol from the beginning to have the first token be a > protocol version, followed by a magic number(which could be different per > version).
Presumably it's too late for that. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
