Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 10/07/05, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 01:57:54 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: >> > I suggested "Debian IV" >> >> Are release numbers really needed? Why not do away with them altogether? >> > you mean, just stick with code names? > > That wouldn't exactly work, Debian's apt/dpkg basicly relies on > release numbers, how else can it easily and quickly realize that > apache2-2.0.40 is older than apache2-2.0.50?
The question here is about version of debian released, not version of package in debian. But the true question is : Does this discussion really needed? Why not do away with it altogether? -- Rémi Vanicat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
