Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > On 20050708T181259-0400, Johan Kullstam wrote: >>What signal is meant by 3.1 versus 4.0? Does your intended audience >>have any concept of the distinction? > > The usual distinction, when it is made, is that bumping the major number > indicates a disruptive upgrade (changing how things work, not just > adding new things). >
the change of gcc 3 to gcc 3 is disruptive (to c++ binaries) a. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
