On 7/12/05, Andrea Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > > On 20050708T181259-0400, Johan Kullstam wrote: > >>What signal is meant by 3.1 versus 4.0? Does your intended audience > >>have any concept of the distinction? > > > > The usual distinction, when it is made, is that bumping the major number > > indicates a disruptive upgrade (changing how things work, not just > > adding new things). > > > > the change of gcc 3 to gcc 3 is disruptive (to c++ binaries)
4? But not to users, which is what the version number is about.
