Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While this argument was indeed tempting, I think we also need > to look at how free the resulting package is: Can a derivbative take > any package in main, modify it, and further redistribute it? If yes, > then the package can remain in main, and is free; if not, then the > package is not free.
Our users have permission to modify it and further redistribute it *as long as they change the name*. That's a limitation we're willing to accept for ourselves - why should it not be free enough for our users? -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
