I demand that Bernd Eckenfels may or may not have written... > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with >> our mirrors
> We dont need to have all architectures on all mirrors. And for the > less-often used architectures we event dont need to care, since one or two > mirrors can easyly hold a stable archive and serve it. Two or three, with sufficient geographical separation? -- | Darren Salt | nr. Ashington, | linux (or ds) at | sarge, | Northumberland | youmustbejoking | RISC OS | Toon Army | demon co uk | We've got Shearer, you haven't Quantised Revision of Murphy's Law: Everything goes wrong all at once. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
