* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050425 18:20]: > Le lundi 25 avril 2005 à 16:54 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit : > > > See, that just makes no sense whatsover. You can claim either: > > > > > > 1) Adding AMD64 would increase the mirror load unacceptably > > > OR > > > 2) Removing ARM would not have a significant effect on the mirror load > > > > > > but not both at the same time. (Yes, I realize that two different people > > > made these claims, but which one am I supposed to believe?)
> > Sure one can: removing arm would be removing arm from testing, not from > > unstable. Currently around 800 (of the > 8000) source packages in > > testing have a different version compared to unstable, even less so > > different arm packages (think big arch:all packages, or arch:i386 > > specific packages). This means that removing arm from testing would > > only save about 1GB of space. > This is true today. Will it still be true in a few months for the > differences between stable and unstable? The size of the mirror pushes is not really changed by keeping some random packages (aka stable) or not. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
