Le lundi 25 avril 2005 à 16:54 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit : > > See, that just makes no sense whatsover. You can claim either: > > > > 1) Adding AMD64 would increase the mirror load unacceptably > > OR > > 2) Removing ARM would not have a significant effect on the mirror load > > > > but not both at the same time. (Yes, I realize that two different people > > made these claims, but which one am I supposed to believe?) > > Sure one can: removing arm would be removing arm from testing, not from > unstable. Currently around 800 (of the > 8000) source packages in > testing have a different version compared to unstable, even less so > different arm packages (think big arch:all packages, or arch:i386 > specific packages). This means that removing arm from testing would > only save about 1GB of space.
This is true today. Will it still be true in a few months for the differences between stable and unstable? -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
