Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 19:29 -0600, Steve Greenland a écrit : > > And the fact exim4 diverges from upstream has *absolutely nothing* to do > > in a debconf note. Debconf is here to promt users, not to document > > changes. > > But how would it hurt to say that choice A is more standard?
More standard for what? AFAIK, Debian is the only widespread operating system which ships exim by default. What the exim maintainers decide becomes the standard for Debian users. Furthermore, how does a thing being "standard" help the user in his choice? The user only thinks of his own needs, thus a correct wording would be "pick A if you don't care". However the current wording is even better; the question isn't even asked at high priority, and the single file method is silently chosen. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
