On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 03:02:00AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Furthermore, how does a thing being "standard" help the user in his > choice? The user only thinks of his own needs, thus a correct wording > would be "pick A if you don't care". However the current wording is even > better; the question isn't even asked at high priority, and the single > file method is silently chosen.
Is the multiple-file configuration logically equivalent to the single-file configuration? If you #include'd all the tiny subfiles, would the resulting config be identical to the single-file config? If so, then what are we really arguing about: they are isomorphic. Perhaps a tool could generate the single-file config for easier double-checking of the split-file config. If not, then the user needs to know what will behave differently. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
