On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 01:07:32 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 00:39 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 22:32:29 -0600, Ron Johnson
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 19:24 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> >> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > There's a *fundamental* difference between "don't want
>> >> > hot-babe in Debian" and "don't want hot-babe to *exist*".
>> >>
>> >> Currently, the procedures for the inclusion of packages in
>> >> Debian allow each developer to decide what to package, provided
>> >> the licenses permit distribution.
>>
>> > Yes, I know. AFAICT, the only way for h-b to not be in Debian
>> > would be if Thibaut VARENE, who filed the original ITP, decided
>> > not to submit the package to Debian.
>>
>> That shall not work, since if the ITP is not followed upon, other
>> people may chose to put the package in Debian. ITP's can be
>> hijacked if the original author does not follow through.
> Picky, picky. You get my point, though. But probably not.
No, what is your point? Just convincing the original ITP filer
is not enough. That was my point.
manoj
--
I took a fish head to the movies and I didn't have to pay. Fish Heads,
Saturday Night Live, 1977.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
