Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, except for..
I'm sorry, I didn't mean that these other possibilities don't exist. Bruce was not suggesting any of them either, and my real point is that none of them are on-topic for debian-devel. > 6. project decides informally that potential legal liabilities outweigh > the benefit of putting some software in Debian, applies this on a > slightly ad-hoc basis (certian possibly-patent-infringing software, but > hardly all of it) I don't know what in practice this amounts to, except the ftp-masters or the DPL enforcing it, which reduces to the previous things. > 7. content of package referred to tech committee, who overrule the > maintainer[2] tech-ctte has no jurisdiction over non-technical matters.
