On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 22:57:19 +0100, Jan Ingvoldstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Here's one useful suggestion, I think:
> If hot-babe is useful as a .deb, make it available as such through
> its own web site or something. This works for many other packages
> not accepted into the Debian tree for whatever reason, why shouldn't
> it work for hot-babe?
The reason other packages are not accepted into Debian is
usually license issues -- they are not fre. Here we have a free
package,m and the only reason to keep it out is narrow minded
bigotry. I see that as a big deal.
> Or, if those of you who really really want hot-babe in a kind of
> distribution feel like it, create your own distribution tree with
> hot-babe and other stuff that's not regularly distributed in main,
> contrib, non-free or non-US. I'm sure there's enough interest
> around to make it popular.
I have. This distribution has been called Debian. I make you
the same offer: if you dislike freedom so much, make your own
distro. Good luck.
manoj
--
She blinded me with science!
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
