-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:45:25AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 07:53:41 +0100, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> > Quoting Fernanda Giroleti Weiden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >> Hi all, I read all the thread and I noted you are forgeting a main
> >> problem about this package. In my point of view:
> >>
> >> First of all, it's a sexist package, sure. Putting a program on
> >> Debian in which you have pictures of nude women is VERY agressive
> >> to the most women. Yes, it's agressive to me.
>
> > As already written in -women, this is the point which saddens me the
> > most in this thread. I'm really disappointed by seeing most
> > contributors just not realize why this package, as proposed, is
> > likely to hurt the feelings of several women (probably not all, I
> > don't know) as well as, indirectly or not, some men.
>
> Packages can hurt feelings, yes. vi hurts mine. The bible
> hurts other peoples. purity-off also hurt a lot of peoples
> feelings. Can't please everyone. There are over 15k packages in
> debian. Some of them surely hurt the sensibilities of a lot of
> people.
>
> Get over it. I have had to.
Hi Manoj,
How would a bug report about 'this packages offends me because of
$SOME_REASON' be handled?' about say .... vi?
- -Kev
- --
counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted!
(__)
(oo)
/------\/
/ | ||
* /\---/\
~~ ~~
...."Have you mooed today?"...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBruSYRp+kG4Nu//URAse4AJ92DQOYKAwD8gs9spFqpj6YLw+0dgCgjaqW
r4ttI1CkaurrDqt1VMvhrTc=
=njei
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
