> I find the notion of introducing censorship in order to not 'hurt > their feelings' to be morally repugnant.
Yes yes, I understand why you don't like it. What I wanted was an explanation of why objecting to this package was probably _more_ offensive than proposing it. (Bearing in mind that in this context, "censorship" simply means not shipping with debian, as opposed to attempting to deny access altogether.) > It has been proven endless times that once you start doing this, you > can't stop. For any package, there is going to be some minority group > that is offended by it. Sounds to me like your problem is not so much with the objection, but with its expected implementation. b.
