On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 20:17, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:48:13PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: > > There's at least one other solution: what if, when a bug tagged > > "upstream" was closed, the mail sent would include the upstream > > ChangeLog (hopefully named ChangeLog in the top directory of the > > package)? > > Can someone familiar with the BTS code tell whether this change is > > trivial or not? > > It's not trivial in the slightest, sorry. The BTS doesn't remotely have > this information available to it, and it's not even easy to arrange for > it to be available.
I'd also be quite annoyed if I was mailed the upstream changelog when a
bug was closed, as these can often get rather large.
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.burtonini.com./
PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
