Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Ean R. Schuessler wrote:
> >
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>
> >> Format: 1.7
> >> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:18:37 -0500
> >> Source: kaffe
> >> Binary: kaffe
> >> Architecture: source i386
> >> Version: 1:1.1.1-1
> >> Distribution: unstable
> >> Urgency: low
> >> Maintainer: Ean R. Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Changed-By: Ean R. Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Description:
> >> kaffe - A JVM to run Java bytecode
> >> Closes: 51230 61264 75800 77869 81389 116802 141597 158743 167936 170021
> >> 170059 193263 196254 196867 197617 200434 202779
> >> Changes:
> >> kaffe (1:1.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
> >> .
> >> * New upstream release closes many bugs. (Closes: #51230, #61264,
> >> #75800, #77869, #116802, #141597, #158743, #170021, #170059,
> >> #193263, #196254, #197617, #202779, #81389, #200434, #196867)
> >> * /usr/lib/jni is now checked for JNI libraries. (Closes: #167936)
> >
> > This is not a proper changelog entry.
> >
> > A proper entry is as follows:
> >
> > * New upstream release.
> > * no longer does foo when bar happens. Closes: #12345
> > * wrapper script rewritten to not use $$ in tempfile names. Closes: #12345
> >
> > Please, everyone remember, a changelog documents *changes*. It's not a tool
> > to close bugs automatically.
>
> This is bullshit.
>
> We've gone through this many times already. Upstream changes should
> not be documented in the Debian changelog, even if they fix bugs in
> the Debian BTS.
Because users that submitted bugs using the Debian BTS do not deserve
the right to get a mail meaningful about the bug they reported?
--
Mathieu Roy
Homepage:
http://yeupou.coleumes.org
Not a native english speaker:
http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english
