On Sun, 22 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Just two questions: > > i) Is there any reason why you decided to include the named binaries in > the chroot? >
Because I was following the instructions at http://www.psionic.com/papers/dns/linux-dns which suggests named and named-xfer should go there. I decided to throw the rest in there too. :-) But if we don't need them there we should definitely take them out. > > > ii) Is there a particular reason to use /var/secure-bind rather than > say /var/named which seems to be some what of an informal default. > Because it is a non-standard /var directory, I thought it would be helpful to name it after the package it belonged to. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
