Re: chroot bind?

[Marco d'Itri]

On Apr 22, Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 >> i) Is there any reason why you decided to include the named binaries in
 >> the chroot?  
 >you have to have at least named-xfer.  
Not with BIND 9. Another reason to use BIND 9.

-- 
ciao,
Marco