On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Ethan Benson wrote: > as a sidenote i think this /var/secure-bind name is lame, it doesn't > follow any conventions and frankly its naive to think that just > because bind is chrooted and running as root that its now fully > secure. more secure yes, a panacea no. >
So change it to more-secure-bind then :-) Or /var/named, whatever is thought best. Btw, Bdale (Debian Bind maintainer) suggested that if we can get this working properly so it can build as an optional package from the standard bind source package, he would include it. He also suggested we use bind 9 as a base not 8. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
