On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 10:20:49PM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote: > Citando Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I know the -goodies packages are in bad shape. > > > Please take some time to help figure out what should be done with > > > these packages -- cleaned up/adopted, or removed from the archive -- > > > before ITPing more packages in the xfce4 namespace. > > Sure. I think for sarge they can be cleaned up/updated. I've just > > finished a stretch getting the 22 packages for the main body of xfce4 > > for 4.2.0 for experimental sorted this weekend so I'm a bit knackered > > currently. > > To be honest I'd been expecting others to sort out the -plugins for > > sarge given people had said they would. > Hi, > > Rudy Godoy seemed interested at one point but now his mail is bouncing > > though I'm ccing him again in case it got fixed. > I've already had the new revisions waiting for a while at mentors.debian.net > I've asked a couple (or more) of times for sponsoring at -mentors and > to the xfce team withouth luck. Didn't "pushed" that much anyway, I > mean talk to my actual sponsors, I was going to do ask for it in these > days. If you have fixes for the release-critical bugs on xfce4-diskperf-plugin and xfce4-showdesktop plugin, and are planning to adopt these packages, I would be willing to sponsor these uploads if you can point me to the source packages. In general, if you're looking to adopt a package with RC bugs and you have packages that need sponsoring, I would recommend posting your packages' URL to the BTS; the choice between sponsoring a maintainer upload, and removing the package from testing, is usually an easy one. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
