* [ 17-01-05 - 01:50 ] Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 02:57:57PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > There are currently 11 orphaned xfce4-* packages in unstable, including > > three that have just been removed from testing due to RC bugs that went > > virtually unnoticed since the last upload in May. > > I know the -goodies packages are in bad shape. > > > Please take some time to help figure out what should be done with > > these packages -- cleaned up/adopted, or removed from the archive -- > > before ITPing more packages in the xfce4 namespace. > > Sure. I think for sarge they can be cleaned up/updated. I've just > finished a stretch getting the 22 packages for the main body of xfce4 > for 4.2.0 for experimental sorted this weekend so I'm a bit knackered > currently. > > To be honest I'd been expecting others to sort out the -plugins for > sarge given people had said they would.
You're right, but (for what concerns me) I am a bit busy with real life in these days. > Likewise Emanuele Rocca seemed interested. I am. > There were some packages that made it to mentors.debian.net - and there > is still some work up there. > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/ WNPP bugs for some of the -goodies need to be retitled from O: to ITP:. I found the time to check -battery-plugin and -clipman-plugin, and I must admit that they're not in a good shape (ITP bugs not closed in the changelog, bugs marked as fixed are actually still reproducible, lintian is not happy)... I don't want to be rude, but I am wondering if Rudy is the right person for these 13 packages, considering that he's got 9 packages in main yet. Rudy, have you really got the time to maintain all the -goodies properly? Why is the Debian Xfce Packages Alioth project dead? [0] IMHO putting these packages under collaborative maintenance would be a better idea. ciao, ema [0] http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-xfce/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
