El día 18/01/2005 a 12:53 Emanuele Rocca escribio ... > WNPP bugs for some of the -goodies need to be retitled from O: to ITP:. >
They wouldn't be ITA? > I found the time to check -battery-plugin and -clipman-plugin, and I > must admit that they're not in a good shape (ITP bugs not closed in the > changelog, bugs marked as fixed are actually still reproducible, lintian > is not happy)... > I don't see any ITP bugs on those both. Yes, they had some lintian warning that I've managed to clean now. > I don't want to be rude, but I am wondering if Rudy is the right person > for these 13 packages, considering that he's got 9 packages in main > yet. > Rudy, have you really got the time to maintain all the -goodies > properly? > I've been working in 8 current packages and 2 new (wavelan and weather). I wasn't considering to manage all myself, in fact I think they (all 13) could be maintained in collaborative way. For now I guess Simon's new list is a very good start towards it. > Why is the Debian Xfce Packages Alioth project dead? [0] > IMHO putting these packages under collaborative maintenance would be a > better idea. > Yes, I agree on this. In fact I remember asking for some "review" from other Xfce maintainers before upload/ask for sponsorship. regards, -Rudy
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
