On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, Steve Langasek wrote: > I'm not sure I understand. Do you mean you think the systemd landscape > may change in the future, making it possible to port systemd to other > kernels; or do you mean that you "would like to see" a single > supported init system, but are willing to sacrifice this desire for a > greater good of keeping Debian portable to other kernels?
The latter. I want to see a single supported init system, and I hope it will happen some day, but I'm OK with sacrificing it for the time being. > With infinite resources and infinite will to match systemd > feature-for-feature on Hurd and FreeBSD, it would obviously be > possible to deliver the same experience on all architectures using > systemd. But we shouldn't kid ourselves by treating this as a *likely* > outcome. Right, I don't believe it is likely either. I was just taking a moment to describe what an ideal world would look like. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com It can sometimes happen that a scholar, his task completed, discovers that he has no one to thank. Never mind. He will invent some debts. Research without indebtedness is suspect, and somebody must always, somehow, be thanked. -- Umberto Eco "How to Write an Introduction" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140121212522.gd12...@rzlab.ucr.edu
