Michael Gilbert <mgilb...@debian.org> writes: > I am a DD. You may have missed the most important part of my last > message about positively solving these problems via liberal nmus (a > DD-only power). Please read that paragraph. It demonstrates an > alternative solution already put to use in practice that can resolve > maintainership problems without tech committee intervention.
I read your entire message. I snipped the parts on which I have no comment. > Since it seems that there is a lot of momentum to push this GR forward, > I would like to make a simple request to slow it down a bit. Please > initiate the discussion on -project before initiating the GR itself so > this can get more visibility and you all can get a better gauge of a > larger set of the project's opinion on the matter. The whole point of the GR discussion period is to have exactly these sorts of discussions. I would prefer to use our existing processes rather than using new processes to "pre-discuss" things for which there's already a standard discussion process. The GR should definitely be mentioned on -project to ensure that people know that the discussion is happening. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87629nebya....@windlord.stanford.edu
