Michael Gilbert <mgilb...@debian.org> writes: > I don't think infeasible or unconstructive are the best qualifiers. > Unconstructive discussions are not necessarily bad since they can easily > be ignored. I'm hard pressed to come up with an infeasible case (except > perhaps when one does not have the ability to send mail over the > internet).
Counterproductive, perhaps? That's the best word that I can come up with to capture my concern, which is that forcing some of these discussions to be public would make the underlying problem considerably worse. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877gu9n921....@windlord.stanford.edu
