On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Mon, 09 Jul 2012, Michael Gilbert wrote: >> Knowledge of that requirement would simply lead to more sanitized >> subjects lines in most cases. Although those lacking that knowledge >> may be in for a surprise. > > If the subject lines were sanitized, then they would cease being > useful, and all the public mailing list would know is that the CTTE > was having a private discussion on some topic. > > If that's what is wanted (something that I don't personally have a > problem with), we should just require that of the CTTE.
Correct. The intent was just to increase some transparency by making the number of private discussions a public matter. The subject suggestion was something I thought up quickly, but other solutions/approaches are likely better. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mnveprbou-2yfsc_yjygoc85gkhbqer5yj0en1wvrq...@mail.gmail.com
