Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Draft GR for permitting private discussion"):
> The change to the core of the wording seems fine to me. However, in our
> previous discussion on IRC, we talked about adding a sentence along the
> lines of:
>
> The Technical Committee is encouraged to hold discussions in public
> where feasible.
Sorry, I seem to have dropped that (probably because it wasn't in
email AFAICT). So:
...
Therefore, amend the Debian Constitution 6.3 as follows (wdiff -i):
3. Public [-discussion and-] decision-making.
[-Discussion,-]
Draft resolutions and amendments, and votes by members of the
committee, are made public on the Technical Committee public
discussion list. There is no separate secretary for the
Committee.
[+<cite>The Technical Committee is encouraged to
hold discussions in public where feasible.</cite>+]
----- GENERAL RESOLUTION ENDS -----
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20474.20988.748522.803...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
