I have been convinced.
What kernel images, packages, source, patches do we want on CD1?
At the moment we have, rough list. Resubmitted in case you have deleated
it. What no source!
Phil.
Package: kernel-image-2.2.20
Package: kernel-image-2.2.20-compact
Package: kernel-image-2.2.20-idepci
Package: kernel-image-2.2.20-reiserfs
Package: kernel-image-2.2.20-udma100-ext3
Package: kernel-image-2.4.16-386
Package: kernel-image-2.4.16-586
Package: kernel-image-2.4.16-586tsc
Package: kernel-image-2.4.16-686
Package: kernel-image-2.4.16-686-smp
Package: kernel-image-2.4.16-k6
Package: kernel-image-2.4.16-k7
Package: kernel-image-2.4.18-386
Package: kernel-image-2.4.18-586tsc
Package: kernel-image-2.4.18-686
Package: kernel-image-2.4.18-686-smp
Package: kernel-image-2.4.18-k6
Package: kernel-image-2.4.18-k7
Package: kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.18-386
Package: kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.18-586tsc
Package: kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.18-686
Package: kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.18-686-smp
Package: kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.18-k6
Package: kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.18-k7
Package: kernel-image-2.4.18-bf2.4
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Santiago Vila wrote:
> What about putting kernel-source-2.4.18 and kernel-source-2.2.20 in CD #1
> instead of the individual kernel-image-* packages? This would leave a
> lot of room for TeX and maybe i18n as well.
>
> (Currently kernel-source-2.4.18 is in CD #6, according to the latest
> jigdo file I have).
>
> The bad thing about those kernel-image-* packages is that normally you
> only want to install one of them, so there is a lot of wasted space in CD #1.
>
--
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin, New Zealand
+64 3 488 2818 Fax +64 3 488 2875 Mobile 025 267 9420
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - preferred. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I sell GNU/Linux & GNU/Hurd CDs. See http://www.copyleft.co.nz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
